atemelbalikbayanblog

Holy Spirit is my guide. Words and writing word thoughts are complicated endeavors for me. Correct grammar escapes me but word thoughts dance in my head all the time. I have to write them down before they dance out of my memory bank. ate mel is short for ate mely, pronounce ah tea meal lei. balikbayan literally means return visit.

Sunday, August 26, 2007

Vietnam & Philippines in the 60's

Pres. Bush VFW speech this week brought to mind the consequence of the fall of Vietnam in 1975 to Ferdinand & Imelda. Marcos had declared martial law in 1973.

The world would learn just how costly these misimpressions would be. In Cambodia, the Khmer Rouge began a murderous rule in which hundreds of thousands of Cambodians died by starvation and torture and execution. In Vietnam, former allies of the United States and government workers and intellectuals and businessmen were sent off to prison camps, where tens of thousands perished. Hundreds of thousands more fled the country on rickety boats, many of them going to their graves in the South China Sea.
Whatever your position is on that debate, one unmistakable legacy of Vietnam is that the price of America's withdrawal was paid by millions of innocent citizens whose agonies would add to our vocabulary new terms like "boat people," "re-education camps," and "killing fields."
There was another price to our withdrawal from Vietnam, and we can hear it in the words of the enemy we face in today's struggle -- those who came to our soil and killed thousands of citizens on September the 11th, 2001.
What did the withdrawal of financial support by US Democratic majority congress to South Vietnam in 1975 mean to Ferdinand & Imelda? At what cost to the Philippine freedom was this non support for South Vietnam by US congress?
Text of speech at Whitehouse website here.
Recently, two men who were on the opposite sides of the debate over the Vietnam War came together to write an article. One was a member of President Nixon's
foreign policy team, and the other was a fierce critic of the Nixon administration's policies. Together they wrote that the consequences of an American defeat in Iraq would be disastrous. Here's what they said: "Defeat would produce an explosion of euphoria among all the forces of Islamist extremism, throwing the entire Middle East into even greater upheaval. The likely human and strategic costs are appalling to contemplate. Perhaps that is why so much of the current debate seeks to ignore these consequences." I believe these men are right.

Labels: